Collusion and soft play
Players may coordinate decisions or avoid competing normally. Repeated play patterns and hand histories can help an operator investigate, but a public guide cannot determine guilt.
RNG testing, account controls, Club administration, and player conduct answer different fair-play questions. This guide identifies the published evidence, dates it, and keeps its conclusions within the scope that evidence supports.
ClubGG is a free poker client that only offers poker gameplay with play money that doesn’t have any monetary value and is not affiliated with, sponsoring, or endorsing this promotional activity.
ClubGG's RNG page states that its random-number generator was tested by BMM Testlabs. The displayed report identifies report number NSUS.1002.01, an evaluation period of 5–15 October 2020, and an issue date of 22 October 2020. Those details make the statement specific and dated.
The report is evidence about the evaluated RNG at that time. It is not a blanket certification of every Club administrator, Union, table setting, account, or future software version. Deep Poker has not conducted an independent technical audit of the RNG.
| Layer | Question | Evidence to check |
|---|---|---|
| RNG | How are cards generated? | Dated test report, evaluated product, scope, and issuer. |
| Account controls | What automated or manual checks exist? | Current official help and administration documentation. |
| Club and Union enforcement | Who reviews conduct and applies an in-app action? | Named policy, responsible administrator, and documented process. |
| Specific incident | What happened in one game or account? | Hand numbers, timestamps, table identifiers, and investigation result. |
These are general risk categories, not accusations about a named account, Club, or Union. A conclusion requires case-specific evidence and review by the responsible platform or administrator.
Players may coordinate decisions or avoid competing normally. Repeated play patterns and hand histories can help an operator investigate, but a public guide cannot determine guilt.
A player may intentionally lose play-money chips to another account. Context across multiple hands matters because one unusual hand is not proof.
Automated play or prohibited real-time assistance can create an unfair advantage. Detection claims should be tied to current official controls, not assumed from marketing language.
One person using multiple accounts can undermine table integrity. Account, device, location, and behavior checks have different coverage and limitations.
Another person may advise or play during a session. This can be difficult to establish without specific evidence and an operator investigation.
Coordinated seating or targeting can affect a game without changing the RNG. Table conduct and card generation are separate fair-play questions.
ClubGG's RNG page states that its RNG was tested by BMM Testlabs and displays report NSUS.1002.01, dated October 2020. This is an attributed, dated software claim and should not be described as a current audit of every Club or game operation.
No. An RNG test concerns card generation. It does not verify a Club administrator, Union enforcement, account behavior, an Agent, or an outside transaction.
ClubGG's Administration Basics and Access Control materials describe account, bot, shared-device, and location-related review or restriction tools. Availability, configuration, and enforcement should be checked in the current official documentation.
No. Deep Poker can summarize published evidence and correct its own guide. It does not certify a Club, guarantee an investigation result, or act as ClubGG support.
Record the date, table or event identifier, relevant account names, hand numbers, and the specific behavior observed. Send account or software reports through ClubGG's official support or the relevant in-app channel.
Read independent guides to poker rules, apps, and player-managed clubs.
Browse Guides